<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: eZineArticles.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marialanger.com/2007/09/07/ezinearticlescom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marialanger.com/2007/09/07/ezinearticlescom/</link>
	<description>Web site and blog for Maria Langer, freelance writer, commercial helicopter pilot, and serious amateur photographer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:42:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Cummings</title>
		<link>http://www.marialanger.com/2007/09/07/ezinearticlescom/#comment-131980</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Cummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marialanger.com/2007/09/07/ezinearticlescom/#comment-131980</guid>
		<description>This has happened to me numerous times.  Not only that, it seems that the publishers then find your site and re-publish articles that you did not even put on ezinearticles.com.

I don&#039;t have the time (or want to put in the time) to fight the republication of articles.  Most of the blogs that they are on are on auto-pilot so you do not even get a response.

I still use ezine but do not post articles that are also posted on my site.  It generates hits and adds some nice back-linkage.

Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has happened to me numerous times.  Not only that, it seems that the publishers then find your site and re-publish articles that you did not even put on ezinearticles.com.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have the time (or want to put in the time) to fight the republication of articles.  Most of the blogs that they are on are on auto-pilot so you do not even get a response.</p>
<p>I still use ezine but do not post articles that are also posted on my site.  It generates hits and adds some nice back-linkage.</p>
<p>Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria Langer</title>
		<link>http://www.marialanger.com/2007/09/07/ezinearticlescom/#comment-114215</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria Langer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 04:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marialanger.com/2007/09/07/ezinearticlescom/#comment-114215</guid>
		<description>No, I understand the point of EA. But it&#039;s simply not for me. I&#039;m not that desperate to get my work in front of people and I really don&#039;t like the complete lack of support by the EA staff on this matter. Seeing my name on nurse-xxx.com and other porn-related sites really rubbed me the wrong way. And EA simply didn&#039;t seem to care. Well, they don&#039;t need me. They have folks like you who are more tolerant of the situation.

Whatever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I understand the point of EA. But it&#8217;s simply not for me. I&#8217;m not that desperate to get my work in front of people and I really don&#8217;t like the complete lack of support by the EA staff on this matter. Seeing my name on nurse-xxx.com and other porn-related sites really rubbed me the wrong way. And EA simply didn&#8217;t seem to care. Well, they don&#8217;t need me. They have folks like you who are more tolerant of the situation.</p>
<p>Whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.marialanger.com/2007/09/07/ezinearticlescom/#comment-114212</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 03:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marialanger.com/2007/09/07/ezinearticlescom/#comment-114212</guid>
		<description>I think your missing the point of how EA and sites like it are used though.   Authors publish works because the EA site itself is ranked high on the web over all.   This means google will usually direct you to the site itself if your name or related material is being looked for.  Thus people get themselves on top of google quickly using the site, which brings them back traffic, and everyone wins!, Yay!   

I have noticed the spam exploits you refer to, and you are correct.   And again, it&#039;s really unfortunate this has become a problem.   But EA does not actively seek out &#039;distributors&#039; as you seem to be thinking.  They don&#039;t have to, google does all the work.  The fine print is to protect their own butt.  In the sue happy world we live in, can you blame them?  In FACT..   Their  terms of service also RESRTICT how many articles can be used per year per domain, reprinted on a site (25).   So you are miss understanding what it is ment for.  It&#039;s really.. hey, this is a great article! And I can legally copy it on my site to show others. But only a sample.  At least that is how it is meant to work.  But most of these porn sites breaks those terms of service.   So efforts are in fact made to close them down.   Not at an authors request but because they hurt everyone, EA and us authors.   The problems is, they pop back up as fast as you can close them down.    So yes, the spam sites will exploit it&#039;s traffic.  And I blame the search engines for being poisoned by the spammers who steal anything that is &#039;popular&#039;, and try and divert traffic from search engines to porn operations.      

 But I also ask, really, just how much of a problem is it?  People with common sense know such pages are just another form of spam, and will find another link, usually several others of the material are available.  (and will be lower than EA itself)   I really don&#039;t think people make the type of association to your material to the domain it is in, like you think,  unless you happen to write about porn, hehe.   Else,frankly it is out of place.  And I think most people understand that.       (It&#039;s kind of like finding an article about Hair Product, in a Brothel...  Do you think, gosh, the author of this article about hair products, must be a pervert?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your missing the point of how EA and sites like it are used though.   Authors publish works because the EA site itself is ranked high on the web over all.   This means google will usually direct you to the site itself if your name or related material is being looked for.  Thus people get themselves on top of google quickly using the site, which brings them back traffic, and everyone wins!, Yay!   </p>
<p>I have noticed the spam exploits you refer to, and you are correct.   And again, it&#8217;s really unfortunate this has become a problem.   But EA does not actively seek out &#8216;distributors&#8217; as you seem to be thinking.  They don&#8217;t have to, google does all the work.  The fine print is to protect their own butt.  In the sue happy world we live in, can you blame them?  In FACT..   Their  terms of service also RESRTICT how many articles can be used per year per domain, reprinted on a site (25).   So you are miss understanding what it is ment for.  It&#8217;s really.. hey, this is a great article! And I can legally copy it on my site to show others. But only a sample.  At least that is how it is meant to work.  But most of these porn sites breaks those terms of service.   So efforts are in fact made to close them down.   Not at an authors request but because they hurt everyone, EA and us authors.   The problems is, they pop back up as fast as you can close them down.    So yes, the spam sites will exploit it&#8217;s traffic.  And I blame the search engines for being poisoned by the spammers who steal anything that is &#8216;popular&#8217;, and try and divert traffic from search engines to porn operations.      </p>
<p> But I also ask, really, just how much of a problem is it?  People with common sense know such pages are just another form of spam, and will find another link, usually several others of the material are available.  (and will be lower than EA itself)   I really don&#8217;t think people make the type of association to your material to the domain it is in, like you think,  unless you happen to write about porn, hehe.   Else,frankly it is out of place.  And I think most people understand that.       (It&#8217;s kind of like finding an article about Hair Product, in a Brothel&#8230;  Do you think, gosh, the author of this article about hair products, must be a pervert?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria Langer</title>
		<link>http://www.marialanger.com/2007/09/07/ezinearticlescom/#comment-113937</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria Langer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 13:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marialanger.com/2007/09/07/ezinearticlescom/#comment-113937</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t realize I made it sound that way, Ray. Funny that no one else picked up on that. Hmm.

I don&#039;t like their business model. They allow &lt;em&gt;anyone&lt;/em&gt; who supposedly agree with their policies to republish my work. I believe I should have the right to say which sites my work should appear on. I also believe authors should be able to blacklist sites, with the review of eZineArticles staff.

Yes, it is different when spammers use articles from eZine Articles. eZine articles gives permission and by submitting to them, I give permission, too. When they steal from my site, there&#039;s no permission. It&#039;s unquestionably copyright infringement and I clearly have the right to issue DMCA and take-down notices.

I was only a part of eZine Articles for a month or so. I only had 5 articles online. But finding those articles on sites with porn names -- and finding that eZine Articles was &lt;em&gt;unwilling to contact the site publisher to get them off&lt;/em&gt; -- was enough for me to realize that I don&#039;t need the kind of exposure eZine Articles offers. 

Evidently, I&#039;m not as desperate for exposure as some of the other authors obviously are. I can get enough exposure on my own. 

I&#039;ve made my decision and explained why. I believe &lt;em&gt;professional writers&lt;/em&gt; who care about where their work appears should avoid distributors like eZine Articles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t realize I made it sound that way, Ray. Funny that no one else picked up on that. Hmm.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like their business model. They allow <em>anyone</em> who supposedly agree with their policies to republish my work. I believe I should have the right to say which sites my work should appear on. I also believe authors should be able to blacklist sites, with the review of eZineArticles staff.</p>
<p>Yes, it is different when spammers use articles from eZine Articles. eZine articles gives permission and by submitting to them, I give permission, too. When they steal from my site, there&#8217;s no permission. It&#8217;s unquestionably copyright infringement and I clearly have the right to issue DMCA and take-down notices.</p>
<p>I was only a part of eZine Articles for a month or so. I only had 5 articles online. But finding those articles on sites with porn names &#8212; and finding that eZine Articles was <em>unwilling to contact the site publisher to get them off</em> &#8212; was enough for me to realize that I don&#8217;t need the kind of exposure eZine Articles offers. </p>
<p>Evidently, I&#8217;m not as desperate for exposure as some of the other authors obviously are. I can get enough exposure on my own. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve made my decision and explained why. I believe <em>professional writers</em> who care about where their work appears should avoid distributors like eZine Articles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.marialanger.com/2007/09/07/ezinearticlescom/#comment-113898</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 05:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marialanger.com/2007/09/07/ezinearticlescom/#comment-113898</guid>
		<description>You make it sound as if EzineArticles purposely distributed the articles to these porn/spam sites.  They did not, and do not do such activities on purpose.  They merely publish on their own website.   Porn/spam operations who grab the content do so on their own doing, and it would be no different then if they stole it from your own blog or site.     Most publish their articles thru the service for backtraffic to their own site, and it works very well for many.   The &#039;real&#039; spammers out there simply want a piece of the traffic, and it is unfortunately they exploit such services.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make it sound as if EzineArticles purposely distributed the articles to these porn/spam sites.  They did not, and do not do such activities on purpose.  They merely publish on their own website.   Porn/spam operations who grab the content do so on their own doing, and it would be no different then if they stole it from your own blog or site.     Most publish their articles thru the service for backtraffic to their own site, and it works very well for many.   The &#8216;real&#8217; spammers out there simply want a piece of the traffic, and it is unfortunately they exploit such services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erica</title>
		<link>http://www.marialanger.com/2007/09/07/ezinearticlescom/#comment-113480</link>
		<dc:creator>Erica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marialanger.com/2007/09/07/ezinearticlescom/#comment-113480</guid>
		<description>As an ezine author myself, I do agree with you on certain points - I don&#039;t appreciate my work placed on spam sites - and often on these spam sites they remove my links and place junk links inside of them.  

I think ezine should have publishers submit the site they are going to re-publish onto approved before they are allowed to even see they &quot;ezine publisher&quot; link.  They should adhere to the guidelines to republish with original links or risk being removed from publisher status.   Authors should have the ability to rank publishers or send reports to ezine on bad publishers.  The public articles should not have a &quot;ezine publisher link&quot;.  Bottom line is ezine could control the spam if they wanted to.

Nonetheless,  write quality articles for my site, and then cut them down and respin them for ezinearticles so not to get duplicate content.  I am one of the top authors in the wedding category and have over 90,000 views on my articles.  One article alone sent over 2,000 visitors to my site.  For traffic purposes it is a great tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an ezine author myself, I do agree with you on certain points &#8211; I don&#8217;t appreciate my work placed on spam sites &#8211; and often on these spam sites they remove my links and place junk links inside of them.  </p>
<p>I think ezine should have publishers submit the site they are going to re-publish onto approved before they are allowed to even see they &#8220;ezine publisher&#8221; link.  They should adhere to the guidelines to republish with original links or risk being removed from publisher status.   Authors should have the ability to rank publishers or send reports to ezine on bad publishers.  The public articles should not have a &#8220;ezine publisher link&#8221;.  Bottom line is ezine could control the spam if they wanted to.</p>
<p>Nonetheless,  write quality articles for my site, and then cut them down and respin them for ezinearticles so not to get duplicate content.  I am one of the top authors in the wedding category and have over 90,000 views on my articles.  One article alone sent over 2,000 visitors to my site.  For traffic purposes it is a great tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria Langer</title>
		<link>http://www.marialanger.com/2007/09/07/ezinearticlescom/#comment-105934</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria Langer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 13:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marialanger.com/2007/09/07/ezinearticlescom/#comment-105934</guid>
		<description>Toby, if they did, they would be infringing my copyright. That&#039;s illegal. 

Ezinearticles gives anyone the right to republish your work. In other words, they can do it legally. I have no recourse to get the work offline. I cannot sue.

I really cannot see any benefit for an established author or consultant or &quot;expert&quot; to publish their work on ezinearticles.com given their complete failure to check &quot;publisher&quot; sites for appropriateness before allowing them to publish. They screen the authors, they screen the content, but they don&#039;t seem to screen the publishers.

I worked hard to get where I am and I don&#039;t need my name brought down by association with questionable sites desperate for content.

Why not simply build relationships with popular blogs that will publish your work? In many instances, they&#039;ll even pay you for it.

Whatever you decide, good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Toby, if they did, they would be infringing my copyright. That&#8217;s illegal. </p>
<p>Ezinearticles gives anyone the right to republish your work. In other words, they can do it legally. I have no recourse to get the work offline. I cannot sue.</p>
<p>I really cannot see any benefit for an established author or consultant or &#8220;expert&#8221; to publish their work on ezinearticles.com given their complete failure to check &#8220;publisher&#8221; sites for appropriateness before allowing them to publish. They screen the authors, they screen the content, but they don&#8217;t seem to screen the publishers.</p>
<p>I worked hard to get where I am and I don&#8217;t need my name brought down by association with questionable sites desperate for content.</p>
<p>Why not simply build relationships with popular blogs that will publish your work? In many instances, they&#8217;ll even pay you for it.</p>
<p>Whatever you decide, good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby VanZandt</title>
		<link>http://www.marialanger.com/2007/09/07/ezinearticlescom/#comment-105895</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby VanZandt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 05:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marialanger.com/2007/09/07/ezinearticlescom/#comment-105895</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t anyone take any of your published content at any time from anywhere, say from this blog right here, republish it on their objectionable site with your name and headline, and make it so hard for you to get it taken down that you would just have to give up and let it stay?  I don&#039;t see how the potential end result can be differentiated between publishing your articles on ezinearticles.com or on marialanger.com.
I&#039;m not asking this just to be provocative.  I&#039;m considering submitting to ezinearticles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t anyone take any of your published content at any time from anywhere, say from this blog right here, republish it on their objectionable site with your name and headline, and make it so hard for you to get it taken down that you would just have to give up and let it stay?  I don&#8217;t see how the potential end result can be differentiated between publishing your articles on ezinearticles.com or on marialanger.com.<br />
I&#8217;m not asking this just to be provocative.  I&#8217;m considering submitting to ezinearticles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria Langer</title>
		<link>http://www.marialanger.com/2007/09/07/ezinearticlescom/#comment-101547</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria Langer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 01:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marialanger.com/2007/09/07/ezinearticlescom/#comment-101547</guid>
		<description>Albany, I don&#039;t agree with you about ezinearticles. ezinearticles LICENSES this work to others, thus legally allowing them to republish my work without my approval. Then, when it gets out there, it&#039;s MY responsibility to track down the owner of a site with a porn name and ask for my work to be removed. Sorry, that just doesn&#039;t fly with me. I write for a living and I&#039;m extremely particular about where my work appears. ezinearticles doesn&#039;t care at all. I don&#039;t need that kind of help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Albany, I don&#8217;t agree with you about ezinearticles. ezinearticles LICENSES this work to others, thus legally allowing them to republish my work without my approval. Then, when it gets out there, it&#8217;s MY responsibility to track down the owner of a site with a porn name and ask for my work to be removed. Sorry, that just doesn&#8217;t fly with me. I write for a living and I&#8217;m extremely particular about where my work appears. ezinearticles doesn&#8217;t care at all. I don&#8217;t need that kind of help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albany Lawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.marialanger.com/2007/09/07/ezinearticlescom/#comment-101534</link>
		<dc:creator>Albany Lawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 22:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marialanger.com/2007/09/07/ezinearticlescom/#comment-101534</guid>
		<description>I think you may miss the point of ezinearticles. I have found it useful but not for the reasons you suggest, and I don&#039;t follow your approach.

There are two main benefits, and I&#039;ve seen both. First, people may find your writing on the ezinearticles site and follow your links to you, creating business for you. Second, having your article on a prominent site like this, with relevant links back to your site, creates link value. The excessive spam content on these sites is probably reducing the value, but it still has some benefit. One of my articles has been viewed over 15,000 times and my web site analytics show that it has referred actual business -- people paying me to handle their speeding tickets.

A key problem is that it sounds like you&#039;re submitting the same content you&#039;ve written somewhere else. That&#039;s not going to help you much, as search engines tend to prefer unique content, and may penalize &quot;duplicate content.&quot; Thus, your articles won&#039;t be seen much and you won&#039;t get much link value from them.

As for your content showing up on other sites, that&#039;s not the fault of ezinearticles. You own the copyright to your content and they don&#039;t have the power to stop others from reusing it. That&#039;s your problem, and in my opinion at least, you&#039;re wasting your time by worrying about it. The spam sites that are republishing your content are seen by very few people and in the long run will probably disappear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you may miss the point of ezinearticles. I have found it useful but not for the reasons you suggest, and I don&#8217;t follow your approach.</p>
<p>There are two main benefits, and I&#8217;ve seen both. First, people may find your writing on the ezinearticles site and follow your links to you, creating business for you. Second, having your article on a prominent site like this, with relevant links back to your site, creates link value. The excessive spam content on these sites is probably reducing the value, but it still has some benefit. One of my articles has been viewed over 15,000 times and my web site analytics show that it has referred actual business &#8212; people paying me to handle their speeding tickets.</p>
<p>A key problem is that it sounds like you&#8217;re submitting the same content you&#8217;ve written somewhere else. That&#8217;s not going to help you much, as search engines tend to prefer unique content, and may penalize &#8220;duplicate content.&#8221; Thus, your articles won&#8217;t be seen much and you won&#8217;t get much link value from them.</p>
<p>As for your content showing up on other sites, that&#8217;s not the fault of ezinearticles. You own the copyright to your content and they don&#8217;t have the power to stop others from reusing it. That&#8217;s your problem, and in my opinion at least, you&#8217;re wasting your time by worrying about it. The spam sites that are republishing your content are seen by very few people and in the long run will probably disappear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SW Washington and Portland Small Business Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; eZineArticles.com &#8212; a Good Idea?</title>
		<link>http://www.marialanger.com/2007/09/07/ezinearticlescom/#comment-73138</link>
		<dc:creator>SW Washington and Portland Small Business Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; eZineArticles.com &#8212; a Good Idea?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 18:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marialanger.com/2007/09/07/ezinearticlescom/#comment-73138</guid>
		<description>[...] You can read more at Maria&#8217;s blog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You can read more at Maria&#8217;s blog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PlagiarismToday &#187; Article Marketing: Death By Spam?</title>
		<link>http://www.marialanger.com/2007/09/07/ezinearticlescom/#comment-64247</link>
		<dc:creator>PlagiarismToday &#187; Article Marketing: Death By Spam?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 19:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marialanger.com/2007/09/07/ezinearticlescom/#comment-64247</guid>
		<description>[...] PT reader and published author Maria Langer found when she experimented with article marketing at Ezine Articles, there&#8217;s a lot of places that you don&#8217;t want your content and your name to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PT reader and published author Maria Langer found when she experimented with article marketing at Ezine Articles, there&#8217;s a lot of places that you don&#8217;t want your content and your name to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.marialanger.com/2007/09/07/ezinearticlescom/#comment-62863</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 00:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marialanger.com/2007/09/07/ezinearticlescom/#comment-62863</guid>
		<description>Sounds like a fun experiment to me! If you do it, let me know how it goes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a fun experiment to me! If you do it, let me know how it goes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria Langer</title>
		<link>http://www.marialanger.com/2007/09/07/ezinearticlescom/#comment-62855</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria Langer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 22:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marialanger.com/2007/09/07/ezinearticlescom/#comment-62855</guid>
		<description>Jonathan, in thinking about this some more, I don&#039;t think I&#039;d mind so much if the article was something I&#039;d whipped up in a few minutes, didn&#039;t care much about, and didn&#039;t put my name on. In other words, some low quality dreck published under a pseudonym. Then I&#039;d get the benefit of the Google Juice without getting dirty (so to speak). 

I&#039;m just wondering if I could write something like that and get it both published and picked up. It would be a good experiment when I&#039;m done with the project I&#039;m working on now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan, in thinking about this some more, I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;d mind so much if the article was something I&#8217;d whipped up in a few minutes, didn&#8217;t care much about, and didn&#8217;t put my name on. In other words, some low quality dreck published under a pseudonym. Then I&#8217;d get the benefit of the Google Juice without getting dirty (so to speak). </p>
<p>I&#8217;m just wondering if I could write something like that and get it both published and picked up. It would be a good experiment when I&#8217;m done with the project I&#8217;m working on now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.marialanger.com/2007/09/07/ezinearticlescom/#comment-62757</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 05:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marialanger.com/2007/09/07/ezinearticlescom/#comment-62757</guid>
		<description>This comes as a surprised to as I&#039;ve always been told to write and submit articles to article directories for extra traffic.

I&#039;m not that sensitive about my articles though I don&#039;t want my articles associated with drugs, sex or gambling.

I have a few submitted at EzineArticles so I need to go check on them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This comes as a surprised to as I&#8217;ve always been told to write and submit articles to article directories for extra traffic.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not that sensitive about my articles though I don&#8217;t want my articles associated with drugs, sex or gambling.</p>
<p>I have a few submitted at EzineArticles so I need to go check on them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
